LogFAQs > #939117438

that's interesting but doesn't seem to be properly to scale. he's using a scale of 1 pixel = $500,000, so you should be able to get the number of pixels by multiplying the number of millions by 2. but then he makes a $50M shape 223 pixels wide which is over double the size it should be.

also using squares makes the relative size of the shapes way off. volume is irrelevant only width matters.

still, it does give a good indication of the difference between tens of millions and hundreds of billions. (and he did get the right width for Bezos at 278k pixels.)

---

The truth basks in scrutiny.
https://imgur.com/GMouTGs http://projecteuler.net/profile/Sahuagin.png