LogFAQs > #941126434

Conflict posted...

Let's take the ambiguous story out of the picture and pretend it's a topic of one of those PublicFreakout clips of a drunk racist disrupting the peace, yelling out slurs and getting knocked out

You guys will come in there and the first thing you'll complain about is the reaction and not the action. Hell, it's not even gonna be a "both sides are wrong". It's the first thing you'll complain about because it's higher on your radar, the same way that for a lot of people, the riots were higher on their radar than... the series of events that led to them.

Everyone knows where your energy truly is

i'd rather talk about solid stories that exist than hypotheticals
if you're just into talking theory about this, here you go:

people should not be hateful in speech and actions. if they are hateful in either a casual or direct way, they may be met with physical repercussions by the recipient of their hate speech/actions. however, the person enforcing the street justice will ultimately have to face a real justice system because you are not allowed to physically injure other people in our civilized society and we try our best on the whole to enforce that.

personally i am not interested in hitting people over things they say, but if someone else chooses to hit people over things they say then they should realize there are legal ramifications for that.

---

i swear to God most of y'all cats just don't know The Trent
you barely know yourself so i guess most of y'all should be offended