LogFAQs > #941860477

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	if they rebooted Lord of the Rings
thrashmetal14 07/08/20 8:50:03 PM #27:	Proto_Spark posted... 9 movies would be way too much. a lot of the stuff in the books were kind of dumb and removing it was the good choice (Tom Bombadil wasting 1/2 an hour is absolutely not needed in the movies) and more movies would mean more situations that need to act as a climax for the movie (compare The Battle of Helms deep between the book/movie) This. I wouldn't call Tom Bombadil "dumb", but even with him there isn't enough material to stretch the story out over 9 fucking movies. Just look at how bad the Hobbit trilogy was. <cite>thrashmetal14 posted [p:941860477] in if they re... [t:78833884]...</cite> <quote>Proto_Spark posted... </cite> <quote>9 movies would be way too much. a lot of the stuff in the books were kind of dumb and removing it was the good choice (Tom Bombadil wasting 1/2 an hour is absolutely not needed in the movies) and more movies would mean more situations that need to act as a climax for the movie (compare The Battle of Helms deep between the book/movie)</quote> This. I wouldn't call Tom Bombadil "dumb", but even with him there isn't enough material to stretch the story out over 9 fucking movies. Just look at how bad the Hobbit trilogy was. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1