LogFAQs > #942091157

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Was Final Fantasy for NES really that great?
philsov 07/14/20 9:40:26 AM #19:	FF1 isn't that good. You select 4 husks of people into one of six classes and then go and save the world. Save points are few; dying at a boss means upwards of an hour lost. Classes are imba; black mage, black belt, and thief are all generally worse than fighter, red mage, and white mage. The last 1/3 of the game is mostly just you invoking weapons that cast medium-level black mage to aoe down whatever you're going up against. During boss fights your red/black mage is there to buff your physical fighters. You're better off playing any of Wizardry 1, Ultima 4, Dragon Warrior 3, or Crystalis. --- Remember that I won't rest, 'til we share the same tense Just know, to me, you're better late than never again. <cite>philsov posted [p:942091157] in Was Final ... [t:78845790]...</cite> <quote>FF1 isn't that good. You select 4 husks of people into one of six classes and then go and save the world. Save points are few; dying at a boss means upwards of an hour lost. Classes are imba; black mage, black belt, and thief are all generally worse than fighter, red mage, and white mage. The last 1/3 of the game is mostly just you invoking weapons that cast medium-level black mage to aoe down whatever you're going up against. During boss fights your red/black mage is there to buff your physical fighters. You're better off playing any of Wizardry 1, Ultima 4, Dragon Warrior 3, or Crystalis. --- Remember that I won't rest, 'til we share the same tense Just know, to me, you're better late than never again.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1