LogFAQs > #942200517

I4NRulez posted...

His quote was dont let black lives matter turn to black lives better.

Which has never been anything that it advocates. No one has ever wanted anything but equality and police reform.

Yes you fucking muppet, that's why he's saying not to let it happen.

"Don't give us cautionary wisdom! That sounds too close to criticism! REEEE! ALT-RIGHT! CANCELLED!"

If you literally cannot even address or regulate the more radical components within your movement when it's the easiest (the same radical elements that exist in any political movement, mind you), then why should anyone trust you to moderate your cause as it gains political influence? This should be a slam dunk thing. A public figure issues a reasonable warning about the risks of radicalism in the age of the internet. Your movement should then go,

"Black Lives Matter does not support or condone any kind of ideology of racial supremacy, be it black or white. Black Lives Matter stands for equality of all people."

Then the public figure would response,

"I'm impressed by the response of BLM to prevent radical elements from becoming embolden within their movement. They are truly exemplars of social justice, blah blah blah, round of applause for everyone".

Every reasonable person pats themself on the back for taking the most basic of steps in preventing extremists minority elements from getting too frisky.

Instead, Twitter tries to cancel Terry Crews when he didn't even criticize BLM, let alone say something actually offensive or slanderous. This is the political theater verson of a layup, and the BLM community blew chunks over their Jordan's.

---

I presume my time here in my darkblack dragondark steel-obliterating solitude has come to its end as well.
http://www.last.fm/user/Pogo92