LogFAQs > #942410215

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 311: Ye says Nay
ChaosTonyV4 07/21/20 6:00:43 PM #326:	Corrik7 posted... To be fair, the framers probably intended it the way that Trump interprets it. However, conservative law backs the letter of the law and not the intent and precedent over interpretation. It is funny that progressives who always back intent over precedent and interpretation over letter of the law now will flip when it is convenient however. It would be good if the law could be amended to make it clear illegal inhabitants are not here in actuality and not to be counted, but it is what it is as of now unfortunately. Dude the first immigration laws werent even made until over 10 years after the 14th Amendment, how and why could you possibly say they intended it to be this way? --- Phantom Dust. "I'll just wait for time to prove me right again." - Vlado <cite>ChaosTonyV4 posted [p:942410215] in Politics C... [t:78848987]...</cite> <quote>Corrik7 posted... </cite> <quote>To be fair, the framers probably intended it the way that Trump interprets it. However, conservative law backs the letter of the law and not the intent and precedent over interpretation. It is funny that progressives who always back intent over precedent and interpretation over letter of the law now will flip when it is convenient however. It would be good if the law could be amended to make it clear illegal inhabitants are not here in actuality and not to be counted, but it is what it is as of now unfortunately.</quote> Dude the first immigration laws werent even made until over 10 years after the 14th Amendment, how and why could you possibly say they intended it to be this way? --- Phantom Dust. "I'll just wait for time to prove me right again." - Vlado</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1