LogFAQs > #942495749

Zeus posted...

Be that as it may, you dismissed the idea that it had to do with anything other than an Epstein investigation, said that it was a hitman, and suggested that the killer's "suicide" was suspicious. So I have to ask you just one thing: How deep does the conspiracy go, stream? How deep does it go?

Rich people w/ secrets had Epstein killed. Rich people w/ secrets (possibly the same ones, but in this case it was about a trial involving a bank, so presumably ones with financial ties to it) likewise put out a hit on this judge, then had someone else kill that guy. Wouldn't be that deep/complex. But we don't know yet. But he targeted the judge, then turns up dead before he can be questioned. That's suspicious as fuck.

faramir77 posted...

I don't agree with a lot of the ideas of third wave feminists. But calling yourself an anti-feminist is pretty pathetic. You can measure a man by the size of the things that concern him.

So, is this the jazzy new version of the "first world problems" dismissal?