LogFAQs > #943554327

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Which of these hypothetical Fire Emblem enemies would be more dangerous?
averagejoel 08/18/20 11:30:12 PM #9:	enemy B is a guaranteed hit (unless you kill them) and chance to crit which metric for crits are we using? double damage? triple damage? double attack (as in, if unit's str + weapon mt = 40, then a crit would use 80 as the base number, and this is the number that would hit the enemy) honestly though it's a no-brainer either way. though I would like to point out that the title and the post are asking the opposite thing, so your results are probably skewed in some way --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:943554327] in Which of t... [t:78920633]...</cite> <quote>enemy B is a guaranteed hit (unless you kill them) and chance to crit which metric for crits are we using? double damage? triple damage? double attack (as in, if unit's str + weapon mt = 40, then a crit would use 80 as the base number, and this is the number that would hit the enemy) honestly though it's a no-brainer either way. though I would like to point out that the title and the post are asking the opposite thing, so your results are probably skewed in some way --- peanut butter and dick</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1