LogFAQs > #944024693

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicOutrage after Bella Thorne charged $200 for a NUDE Pic but it WASN'T Nude!!!
Fam_Fam
08/30/20 11:34:30 PM
#11:


streamofthesky posted...
We need actual, outright pay-for-sex prostitution legal in this country.
The idea that these dudes are shelling out all this money just for a picture is fucking unreal. An hour for sex would be the cost of just a couple pictures.
I want to assume it's because it's legally risky (and potentially personally embarrassing) to get caught hiring a prosititute, while as simping is easy, and that if the former were less risky, the latter would naturally decline because...who the fuck would choose simping over getting laid?

To answer the poll, yes. I've always supported legal prostitution. It's honestly this stuff that bothers me way more. Ends up financially ruining people and seems to boil down to women preying on dudes with some major mental health and esteem issues. It's really not much different than video game companies that prey on whales w/ lootboxes....

its supply and demand. free market 101. if it wasn't worth it, people wouldn't pay for me. unless you are saying people who pay for nudes are sex addicts or something.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1