LogFAQs > #945041538

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 323: Peaceful Transition of Topics
Inviso 09/24/20 6:52:20 PM #67:	I think the confusion I'm having with this argument is that it seems like all aspects of the police are involved in the police union. This isn't like your normal union where the workers are united in opposition to management. In the police union, the "management" seems to be part of the union itself. So abolishing the union seems like it's just a symbolic gesture, since the people who run the union would still have concentrated power as part of the overall police force. My interpretation of Red's argument is that you can't just say "abolish the police union and we can make changes" because the ENTIRE police establishment IS the police union. There's no separation between the police as a unit and the police union. They are one in the same. --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso <cite>Inviso posted [p:945041538] in Politics C... [t:78997456]...</cite> <quote>I think the confusion I'm having with this argument is that it seems like all aspects of the police are involved in the police union. This isn't like your normal union where the workers are united in opposition to management. In the police union, the "management" seems to be part of the union itself. So abolishing the union seems like it's just a symbolic gesture, since the people who run the union would still have concentrated power as part of the overall police force. My interpretation of Red's argument is that you can't just say "abolish the police union and we can make changes" because the ENTIRE police establishment IS the police union. There's no separation between the police as a unit and the police union. They are one in the same. --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1