LogFAQs > #945867796

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	I had no idea that "sexual preference" was offensive.
Eliza3 10/14/20 10:56:59 PM #72:	nfearurspecimn posted... no, but calling people whiny non-LGBT people over a goddang term that really isn't that bad is not a good look. pick your battles. I'm on the LGBT spectrum btw so am I. it's also literally the same as white people complaining that they can't use certain racial terms. Now if we're gonna say "okay I understand it's offensive because it's outdated and we have a better term for it now, but I wanna have a discussion about the meaning of the word 'preference' just for shits and giggles" then sure go ahead, why not? most of the posts ITT, however, have been akin to "wow what are they gonna be offended by next??" IMO, that's a much worse hill to die on. --- The Original Eliza. <cite>Eliza3 posted [p:945867796] in I had no i... [t:79040612]...</cite> <quote><cite>nfearurspecimn posted... </cite> <quote>no, but calling people whiny non-LGBT people over a goddang term that really isn't that bad is not a good look. pick your battles. I'm on the LGBT spectrum btw</quote>so am I. it's also literally the same as white people complaining that they can't use certain racial terms. Now if we're gonna say "okay I understand it's offensive because it's outdated and we have a better term for it now, but I wanna have a discussion about the meaning of the word 'preference' just for shits and giggles" then sure go ahead, why not? most of the posts ITT, however, have been akin to "wow what are they gonna be offended by next??" IMO, that's a much worse hill to die on. --- The Original Eliza.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1