LogFAQs > #945904629

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Amy Coney Barrett cannot list the five components of the First Amendment.
shadowofwar 10/15/20 9:30:21 PM #64:	paerarru posted... Again, nobody's saying that she never learned this. It's just a very basic thing that she couldn't recall at the moment. Yeah it's just like if I goofed and said "klnop", or whatever. What we're saying is precisely that a SCOTUS nominee shouldn't make even this little goof. You expect them to have not just a level of competence, but mastery. Is she qualified for the job? Sure, there's no doubt of that. She can handle it. But is she the best candidate for the position, at this time, or even a good candidate? ...probably not, there are better candidates who are not nominated only for political reasons. And that's wrong. Lets be real. If it wasn't this, it'd be something else. <cite>shadowofwar posted [p:945904629] in Amy Coney ... [t:79040071]...</cite> <quote>paerarru posted... </cite> <quote>Again, nobody's saying that she never learned this. It's just a very basic thing that she couldn't recall at the moment. Yeah it's just like if I goofed and said "klnop", or whatever. What we're saying is precisely that a SCOTUS nominee shouldn't make even this little goof. You expect them to have not just a level of competence, but mastery. Is she qualified for the job? Sure, there's no doubt of that. She can handle it. But is she the best candidate for the position, at this time, or even a good candidate? ...probably not, there are better candidates who are not nominated only for political reasons. And that's wrong.</quote>Lets be real. If it wasn't this, it'd be something else. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1