LogFAQs > #946350908

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Amy Coney Barrett got confirmed
Entity13 10/27/20 12:46:52 AM #54:	SirPikachu posted... Wow, can't wait for literally nothing to change. To be fair, the Supreme Court can only rule if cases are brought to them. That depends on such factors as how lower courts handle their own rulings and escalation, and how much money attorneys are willing to throw at escalating their cases. CyborgSage00x0 posted... One of the ideas is if the Dems don't expand/contract the SC, they may also put term limits on appointments (like 18 years). Or they could do that in tandem with any court seat adjustments. Something has to be done either way. Ideas are nice. Things do need to change for the better, compared to how things have been going for the last four or five decades, but ideas are nice. --- http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb179/EntityXIII/entityfn7.jpg <cite>Entity13 posted [p:946350908] in Amy Coney ... [t:79065665]...</cite> <quote>SirPikachu posted... </cite> <quote>Wow, can't wait for literally nothing to change.</quote> To be fair, the Supreme Court can only rule if cases are brought to them. That depends on such factors as how lower courts handle their own rulings and escalation, and how much money attorneys are willing to throw at escalating their cases. CyborgSage00x0 posted... </cite> <quote>One of the ideas is if the Dems don't expand/contract the SC, they may also put term limits on appointments (like 18 years). Or they could do that in tandem with any court seat adjustments. Something has to be done either way.</quote> Ideas are nice. Things do need to change for the better, compared to how things have been going for the last four or five decades, but ideas are nice. --- http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb179/EntityXIII/entityfn7.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1