LogFAQs > #946373976

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Watching the Hobbit trilogy again
JimmyFraska 10/27/20 3:51:47 PM #8:	Proto_Spark posted... This. IIRC it was only supposed to be 2, but studio greed got in the way so they had to awkwardly stretch 2 movies into 3 really long ones. It was the filmmakers decision. From how they wrote it, it was honestly better to make it 3 instead of 2. But, they probably shouldn't have wrote it that way in the first place. Yeah, they are not terrible, if you think of them basically as a tv series. Honestly, it makes me wish each of the 3 LotR parts had been longer. I'm only bothered by the fact that Hobbit is so close to the length of LotR. <cite>JimmyFraska posted [p:946373976] in Watching t... [t:79067361]...</cite> <quote>Proto_Spark posted... </cite> <quote>This. IIRC it was only supposed to be 2, but studio greed got in the way so they had to awkwardly stretch 2 movies into 3 really long ones.</quote>It was the filmmakers decision. From how they wrote it, it was honestly better to make it 3 instead of 2. But, they probably shouldn't have wrote it that way in the first place. Yeah, they are not terrible, if you think of them basically as a tv series. Honestly, it makes me wish each of the 3 LotR parts had been longer. I'm only bothered by the fact that Hobbit is so close to the length of LotR. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1