LogFAQs > #947630915

I enjoyed the first in spite of it's references because it was an interesting angle on the nostalgia.

This wasn't just some dump of references for the sake of nostalgia. the story was set decades in the future. It was the conceit of the entire world becoming nostalgic for someone else's nostalgia. An interesting angle to take, even if it came across quite insufferably at times.

That said, the second book is total tripe. Read the whole thing, and not only didn't it need to exist, but it's one of those sequels. You know the type. The kind that make you retroactively like the earlier installments less.

---

Haven't had a good sig idea since 2006