LogFAQs > #947691360

Generally attractive, but it starts to seem weird if I think too much about it. That weirdness applies to most of the body, though. Pay too much attention and I start to consider the actual anatomical breakdown, at which point it becomes more of an object of study than an ordinary part of the body.

DJquackquack posted...

If its anatomically inaccurate, how is it natural? Are you saying the concept, of an outtie vag is anatomically inaccurate?

Anatomically, the word "vagina" refers specifically to the vaginal canal. It's just a hole, so it axiomatically cannot be "outie." The outie/innie distinction is a matter of labia shape, which would fall under the term "vulva."

Colloquially, though, "vagina" covers basically everything south of the cervix that isn't a leg, so the distinction gets largely ignored.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.