| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Man walks in on guy robbing diner. Casually shoots him dead. Won't be charged. |
| UnfairRepresent 12/04/20 4:26:58 AM #150: | The Sock posted... Most gun owners are responsible, and said gun owners hope to never have to actually use their guns, and same said gun owners would never be happy about killing anybody. They do whatever they have to do have to protect their loved ones or even strangers. The shooter in this story? I'm willing to bet that he wasn't happy about killing the robber. He did what he had to do. It's easy for us to say "Oh, why didn't he just shoot him in the leg or in the shoulder?" Well, that's easy for us to say because we weren't actually there. We didn't know what went on."Just shoot the leg" is idiotic and I cringe when Joe Biden said it What's rule 1 of gun ownership? Always assume the gun is loaded. Correct But what's rule 1 of shooting a gun at someone? Always always always aim got center mass or in other words chest. Several reasons why 1. Your aim is not as good as you think it is . Especially against a moving tartet in a high stress fast situation. You might miss the chest, let alone the head or limb and in doing so put the bystanders and property in jeopardy 2. This isn't a movie. People can still die from being shot in the leg or arm and also people can be largely unaffected by being shot in the arm or leg. Especially if they are hopped up on something Shoot another gunman in the arm or leg and both extremes are possible . he could still die or he could just shoot you back Aiming for the leg is idiocy and anyone who promotes it is at best ignorant of gun safety might as well say "why not shoot the guns out of his hand?" --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! https://imgur.com/yPw05Ob ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |