LogFAQs > #948973348

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicNot getting $2,000 to protect Section 230 is stupid
Graycap
12/31/20 9:53:58 PM
#14:


OnlyTheTruth posted...
I can get you more links of more democrats wanting to change/kill it.

https://www.cnet.com/google-amp/news/democrats-and-republicans-agree-that-section-230-is-flawed/

From your own article:

Biden told The New York Times editorial board earlier this year, he thinks the whole provision should be eliminated.

But aside from Biden, most Democrats in Congress interested in Section 230 reform, believe amendments to the statute should be limited in scope to ensure free speech is protected. They've criticized Trump and the DOJ for their efforts.

The only Dems who agree with Trump on revoking 230 are lolBiden and his cronies. Other Democrats are simply looking into reforming the law so that platforms can be held liable for profiting off of false advertisements.
---
Say it on your main.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1