LogFAQs > #949754762

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 361: The Art of the Heal
xp1337
01/21/21 1:26:26 PM
#309:


The flip side of "But what would House Republicans have done to the ACA if there was no Senate" is that if there were no Senate then Pelosi passed the public option back during 2009 and it was the Senate that warped the ACA into what it ultimately became.

Abolishing the Senate is basically the right call small-d democratically and for empowering the legislative branch - concerns about "But imagine what the GOP could do with total control!" is an argument against giving the GOP total control! And honestly, if they can win democratically (and I stress democratically here, the Electoral College and the incessant voter suppression is anything but) then they've earned the right to try and enact their agenda - it would be what the people voted for as much as I would despair about the consequences.

Instead we have this bastardized system where they can govern - and gain total control of all three branches - with minority rule and that is very much a problem, especially since they've embraced that and continue to double-down on it.

---
xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out?
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1