LogFAQs > #950062802

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	12,276 lists used to find the 1,000 greatest films of all-time!!!
RadiantJoyrock 01/29/21 4:45:34 PM #31:	IShall_Run_Amok posted... The most radical "advancements" in "technique" have their roots in films from the 60s and earlier, though. The technological advancements don't really improve things much after the 60s, either, and are arguably detrimental to the medium, or at least, irrelevant due to the lack of access to, or interest in, these "advancements" by more creative artists. This is an absolute joke of a post lol IShall_Run_Amok posted... I've literally no idea why anyone would even think this. Because they're not an idiot? There's plenty of astounding literature, and if you're going to claim nothing in the last 50 years holds up, I'm going to say you're full of shit. <cite>RadiantJoyrock posted [p:950062802] in 12,276 lis... [t:79265676]...</cite> <quote>IShall_Run_Amok posted... </cite> <quote>The most radical "advancements" in "technique" have their roots in films from the 60s and earlier, though. The technological advancements don't really improve things much after the 60s, either, and are arguably detrimental to the medium, or at least, irrelevant due to the lack of access to, or interest in, these "advancements" by more creative artists.</quote>This is an absolute joke of a post lol IShall_Run_Amok posted... </cite> <quote>I've literally no idea why anyone would even think this.</quote>Because they're not an idiot? There's plenty of astounding literature, and if you're going to claim nothing in the last 50 years holds up, I'm going to say you're full of shit. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1