LogFAQs > #950591902

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	How many of my team sport GOATs do you agree with?
Eddv 02/13/21 9:33:17 AM #37:	Xtlm posted... lol and Bonds would not have been in the same shape, had the same video to study, have the same nutritionist, or have the same training equipment if he played in 1920. It's not like you could just plop 2002 Bonds into the equation. Comparing era's straight up like that is silly and degrading the level of competition is also silly. Just look at the two of them. Bonds is clearly the superior athlete. By a lot. But hes also the better baseball player. Bonds was a true 5 tool player. Ruth pitched for a reason - he was a true liability in the field and thats where you played a guy like that back then. Which again reinforces the overall point that the pitching wasnt just worse...it was for the most part really really bad. --- Board 8's Voice of Reason https://imgur.com/AWY4xHy <cite>Eddv posted [p:950591902] in How many o... [t:79290493]...</cite> <quote>Xtlm posted... </cite> <quote>lol and Bonds would not have been in the same shape, had the same video to study, have the same nutritionist, or have the same training equipment if he played in 1920. It's not like you could just plop 2002 Bonds into the equation. Comparing era's straight up like that is silly and degrading the level of competition is also silly.</quote> Just look at the two of them. Bonds is clearly the superior athlete. By a lot. But hes also the better baseball player. Bonds was a true 5 tool player. Ruth pitched for a reason - he was a true liability in the field and thats where you played a guy like that back then. Which again reinforces the overall point that the pitching wasnt just worse...it was for the most part really really bad. --- Board 8's Voice of Reason https://imgur.com/AWY4xHy</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1