LogFAQs > #951056640

But the problem at the end of all of this is that Tommy is demanding we show him irrefutable evidence that Rowling is anti-trans. Specifically anti-trans.

And we don't have that. What we have is her established (over the course of a year and change) attitude that she needs to protect ciswomen and educate people about how "sex is real" when that was an issue that was never really on the table. She's "just stating facts" when she incorrectly claims about the risk transwomen pose to ciswomen, whether in the bathroom or otherwise. She's just "speaking about her own trauma" when she claims transmen are just women who, when presented with the unfairness of man's society, feel that "transitioning to being a man" makes more sense than continuing to live as an oppressed woman.

Like even if you just look at her essay and nothing more, you can see this isn't just a flippant one off attitude "that we can safely let go". This is clearly a topic she's dwelled on for some time.

---

CyricZ He/him