LogFAQs > #951685370

Zeus posted...

The reason the trend exists was already explained.

Mind pointing out where? Bear in mind that the trend in question is not "women make less than men," it's "women are generally less likely to negotiate salaries than men," which does not appear to have been explained anywhere in this topic (or anywhere else, that I've seen).

Zeus posted...

I'm not sure what the context of that discussion was, but given your tendency to conflate and distort, it was likely a matter where somebody AGREED to follow a set of rules and then tried to pretend that the rules shouldn't apply to them. It would fit your pattern of special pleading.

Remember kids: Agreeing to follow rules means it's never reasonable to challenge them ever, and nobody else should weigh in on how reasonable the rules are because they're just the rules and people just have to follow them because they're the rules.

I believe the specific context was regarding a school dress code, or possibly that one mom whose kids were kicked out of Catholic school because she did porn, but the specific context really doesn't matter. You have a habit of defending the status quo for no other reason and with no other justification than that it's the status quo, which is really terribly lazy. Attempting to call people lazy for doing the opposite of that (that is, looking for actual justification for the status quo) was (and is) utterly absurd.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.