LogFAQs > #952861168

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The Democrats introduced legislation to pack the supreme court.
Musourenka 04/15/21 12:38:24 PM #73:	Samurontai posted... Serious question, but did packing the courts really hurt the dems as badly as people think it would? Didnt the SC, with a Republican majority, stop a huge amount of things that Trump tried to do? While Obama got screwed out of his nomination, the "packing" didn't occur until 2020, with Barrett taking RBG's seat. Barrett also recused herself from several cases. That Gorsuch and Kavanaugh did not 100% back Trump in Supreme Court cases does not mean they (and Barrett) won't back 80%+ of future Republican sides to cases. So essentially, we haven't yet seen the full effects of the GOP's court packing. --- Shooing away pigeons crapping on debate tables is not a violation of the pigeons' free speech. <cite>Musourenka posted [p:952861168] in The Democr... [t:79406741]...</cite> <quote>Samurontai posted... </cite> <quote>Serious question, but did packing the courts really hurt the dems as badly as people think it would? Didnt the SC, with a Republican majority, stop a huge amount of things that Trump tried to do?</quote> While Obama got screwed out of his nomination, the "packing" didn't occur until 2020, with Barrett taking RBG's seat. Barrett also recused herself from several cases. That Gorsuch and Kavanaugh did not 100% back Trump in Supreme Court cases does not mean they (and Barrett) won't back 80%+ of future Republican sides to cases. So essentially, we haven't yet seen the full effects of the GOP's court packing. --- Shooing away pigeons crapping on debate tables is not a violation of the pigeons' free speech.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1