LogFAQs > #953453182

legendary_zell posted...

The example you're using is a trans women that got knocked out by a "biological woman" and never won anything of note in her career. You are ascribing the issue to Fox being a trans woman but you don't seem to have any evidence for that conclusion specifically. It's really telling that people only seem to have a few key stories, Fallon Fox, that video that Unfair posted, and jokes from comedians. Not evidence from actual sports results in the real world or actual studies.

This is a bullshit argument.

You can't simutaniously argue that "there just isn't enough evidence due to the sheer small amount of transgenders" and at the same time argue that "All the examples of transgenders having massive advantages in the womens leagues don't count because there's so few cases!"

Hell that fact alone is incredibly damning for the physical reality of the biological human body.

Why do you think they segregated womens leagues in the first place?

The argument you're proposing is not only untrue, but to use it the argument would still be to keep transgender bans for female leagues in place until you provide "Adequate data" to prove there is no advantage. Not just keep ignoring blatant advantages and going "that doesn't count" over and over.

Serena Williams is a physical marvel.
She would be spanked by any top 300 male player with complete and utter ease.

You can't just ignore this because it sucks and you wish it wasn't true. That's religion. Don't fall for religion.

---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair!
https://imgur.com/yPw05Ob