LogFAQs > #954407621

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Outrage after a Philadelphia Steakhouse posted THIS MESSAGE Outside! Is it Bad?
Muscles 05/28/21 7:06:11 PM #31:	SaltyAndSweet posted... they can actually since theyre communicating it beforehand if someone refused to pay after eating they could be arrested or charged but they would also be free to sue the restaurant owner, but theyd have to convince a judge that they werent aware of the minimum purchase requirement, since knowledge of it before ordering would most likely be viewed as agreement to the contract If they communicated that they don't serve protected class beforehand does that suddenly make it ok? --- Muscles Chicago Bears \| Chicago Blackhawks \| Chicago Bulls \| Chicago Cubs \| NIU Huskies <cite>Muscles posted [p:954407621] in Outrage af... [t:79482287]...</cite> <quote>SaltyAndSweet posted... </cite> <quote>they can actually since theyre communicating it beforehand if someone refused to pay after eating they could be arrested or charged but they would also be free to sue the restaurant owner, but theyd have to convince a judge that they werent aware of the minimum purchase requirement, since knowledge of it before ordering would most likely be viewed as agreement to the contract</quote>If they communicated that they don't serve protected class beforehand does that suddenly make it ok? --- Muscles Chicago Bears \| Chicago Blackhawks \| Chicago Bulls \| Chicago Cubs \| NIU Huskies</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1