LogFAQs > #954446473

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Idaho passes laws to kill 90% of state's wolves
MondoMan180 05/29/21 11:38:04 PM #13:	Reigning_King posted... I really hate that sensationalist, often outright false, headline posting is the norm for reporting on virtually all subjects. Read the actual senate bill (Bill 1211), it's only 10 pages long, it won't take much time. I read both the NPR article and this Nat Geo article https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/idaho-bill-90-percent-of-wolves-to-be-killed If there's anything missing why not explain what that might be? I have hundreds of bookmarks and videos saved, so why do I need to read 10 pages of legislative text? NPR and National Geographic are professional and reputable news organizations. Ok I reviewed the Bill here. https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2021/legislation/S1211.pdf I take it the issue is that there's no actual "90%" figure presented, making the headlines seem sensationalist to you? You're right, but that isthe PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCSE of the Bill, because once it dips BELOW 150 wolves Federal Management kicks in, the Bill is actually technically WORSE because it really actually allows hunters and ranchers to kill ALL the wolves; the only reason that wouldn't actually be allowed is because of course Federal law supersedes State law. I hate these small-d---ed hunters and ranchers. I have no problem hunting for food or hunting invasive species or population control, but trophy hunters, and punishing wolves for less than a couple hundred cattle killed out of millions, man F' all those guys. I hope Biden can somehow intervene... --- Just call me M80 Matey ;) <cite>MondoMan180 posted [p:954446473] in Idaho pass... [t:79485607]...</cite> <quote>Reigning_King posted... </cite> <quote>I really hate that sensationalist, often outright false, headline posting is the norm for reporting on virtually all subjects. Read the actual senate bill (Bill 1211), it's only 10 pages long, it won't take much time.</quote> I read both the NPR article and this Nat Geo article https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/idaho-bill-90-percent-of-wolves-to-be-killed If there's anything missing why not explain what that might be? I have hundreds of bookmarks and videos saved, so why do I need to read 10 pages of legislative text? NPR and National Geographic are professional and reputable news organizations. Ok I reviewed the Bill here. https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2021/legislation/S1211.pdf I take it the issue is that there's no actual "90%" figure presented, making the headlines seem sensationalist to you? You're right, but that isthe PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCSE of the Bill, because once it dips BELOW 150 wolves Federal Management kicks in, the Bill is actually technically WORSE because it really actually allows hunters and ranchers to kill ALL the wolves; the only reason that wouldn't actually be allowed is because of course Federal law supersedes State law. I hate these small-d---ed hunters and ranchers. I have no problem hunting for food or hunting invasive species or population control, but trophy hunters, and punishing wolves for less than a couple hundred cattle killed out of millions, man F' all those guys. I hope Biden can somehow intervene... --- Just call me M80 Matey ;)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1