LogFAQs > #954552043

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicWhat's your stance on the naomi osaka situation?
MZero
06/02/21 4:02:53 AM
#90:


BlackJackCat posted...
That's all well and good, but the purse from participating and winning tennis matches is not the bread and butter of a player. So again, this falls short. If her endorsements take issue with her stances, certainly this is a problem, but why should press events where endorsements are rarely made concern them?

Thus is comes down to why even do them to begin with. So we're left with this:

I don't think you're getting my point. If she (or any other player) wants to play in the tournament, she has to fulfill the media obligations. If she's fine with just the endorsements then she doesn't need to enter the tournament, and thus doesn't have to do any press. (granted I imagine she would lose a lot of endorsements by not playing)

So why is she entering the tournament to begin with? Money? Fame? Legacy? The chance to play other top players? Regardless, if she can get whatever it is she wants without entering the tournament, then she can decide whether she wants to do media or not.

---
MZero, to the extreme
I never saw azuarc coming, but he won the Guru!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1