LogFAQs > #954797670

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Conservatives are OUTRAGED over this video on NICKELODEON!! Are you Mad too?
hockeybub89 06/08/21 11:29:50 PM #30:	joe40001 posted... I do wonder if there is anything where even LGBT+ would go "yeah, that's overstating it". Like surely there has to be some limit to what you can do in the name of "pride" before you are overstepping. I wonder what some such people would think that would be. Also, idk particularly after adding black and brown, LGBT+ seems more and more like an organization defined by it's omissions. Like clearly if there was an organization that was like "everybody not named Bob Davidson should take pride in themselves" then the guy named Bob Davidson would be like "Bro, what the fuck?" And sure the organization could be like "that's not meant as an insult Bob" But I mean, I'm sure most of us would understand Bob's position on this. They are getting pretty close to the point of saying "everybody who is not straight, not cis, or not white (or Asian?) should take pride in themselves" Am I the only one getting that vibe? Has Bob Davidson historically held down everyone else in the world? Has Bob Davidson always been privileged to have the world accept him? LGBT people can be imprisoned and killed in half the world and half the people in the other half think LGBT existence is offensive to their religion. 90% of people are straight and cis, and you're here going "idk maybe LGBT pride has gotten out of hand and hurts straight people?" --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:954797670] in Conservati... [t:79502620]...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted... </cite> <quote>I do wonder if there is anything where even LGBT+ would go "yeah, that's overstating it". Like surely there has to be some limit to what you can do in the name of "pride" before you are overstepping. I wonder what some such people would think that would be. Also, idk particularly after adding black and brown, LGBT+ seems more and more like an organization defined by it's omissions. Like clearly if there was an organization that was like "everybody not named Bob Davidson should take pride in themselves" then the guy named Bob Davidson would be like "Bro, what the fuck?" And sure the organization could be like "that's not meant as an insult Bob" But I mean, I'm sure most of us would understand Bob's position on this. They are getting pretty close to the point of saying "everybody who is not straight, not cis, or not white (or Asian?) should take pride in themselves" Am I the only one getting that vibe?</quote>Has Bob Davidson historically held down everyone else in the world? Has Bob Davidson always been privileged to have the world accept him? LGBT people can be imprisoned and killed in half the world and half the people in the other half think LGBT existence is offensive to their religion. 90% of people are straight and cis, and you're here going "idk maybe LGBT pride has gotten out of hand and hurts straight people?" --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1