LogFAQs > #955135906

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Sooo, why is Lola Bunny over-corrected?
superman 2000 06/17/21 3:04:45 PM #1:	I get it; she had too much "sexy" energy in the original. Fair enough. It was never that bad IMO, but whatever. They tone it down. But now she has like...no bosom whatsoever. Her chest is as flat as Bugs'. Why? Her chest was never exaggerated to begin with. By denying her boobs at all, they ironically push a "breasts = bad" message that's just as problematic as the "female = sexy" message they sought to go against. --- I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow. <cite>superman 2000 posted [p:955135906] in Sooo, why ... [t:79519221]...</cite> <quote>I get it; she had too much "sexy" energy in the original. Fair enough. It was never that bad IMO, but whatever. They tone it down. But now she has like...no bosom whatsoever. Her chest is as flat as Bugs'. Why? Her chest was never exaggerated to begin with. By denying her boobs at all, they ironically push a "breasts = bad" message that's just as problematic as the "female = sexy" message they sought to go against. --- I don't hold grudges. Let's vehemently argue today and casually have a beer together tomorrow.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1