LogFAQs > #955230559

SerperiorThanU posted...

You're not making arguments.

Plenty of articles I've posted back up my claims

When Schools Ban Smartphones, Students Test Scores Improve
https://www.govtech.com/education/k-12/when-schools-ban-smartphones-students-test-scores-improve.html
A new study, covering more than 130,000 students across England, looks at how cellphone policies have changed since 2001.

Lower test scores for students who use computers often in school, 31-country study finds
https://www.thetechedvocate.org/lower-test-scores-students-use-computers-often-school-31-country-study-finds/

You literally ignore all the evidence I shove right in front of your face.

You're just posting logical fallacies and intentionally misreading things to support your narrative with a big heaping of hypocrisy to go along with it.

No need to misread anything when evidence is given.
They back my conclusions.
Research has shown superior Test Results for students that aren't distracted.

But you're a big advocate for distracting students in the middle of class with their Smart Devices & LapTops.

God forbid making a nice and focused class room where the teacher can get on with their work and not worryign about their students mind wandering off thanks to the power of the Internet / Social Media / Games / etc.

Not to mention, you've been going for ad hominems yourself ITT.

This is rich, coming from you and all your personal attacks on my character, who I am. My educational achievements when I was a student.

You know JACK SQUAT about me, but proceed to insult me repeatedly

Because I know you're just going to be intentionally dense and waste my time like you've been doing.

You're denser than a Neutron Star.
You can't even understand the basic concept of improving the Classroom environment for the vast majority of students and helping improve their learning.

You're fixated on Tech being the magical cure all to education when it has proven otherwise.

Have you ever heard the phrase that "Less is More"?

Yeah, the section that's nuanced and balances out your section is just "fluff" and you worry about posting 8000 characters even though you have no qualms making 4+posts in a row. What a joke.

It's called debating you, it takes time to break down your false hoods.

Not only have I posted tons, your own articles do it for me anyway. My argument is literally just that technology is beneficial and works in school which your own articles state too.

In limited & very controlled circumstances for niche applications and special situations.

Tech is not a Cure All to help students. It has been shown to be more of a hindrance, especially if the student brings their own device which inevitably distracts themselves and others around them.

Tech is fine, @ home.

Tech isn't fine when it's distracting the student from learning in the class room.

There are knock on affects from that

Of course, there are flaws which your articles point out, but none of them share your stance that student technology should be banned.

And yet France went whole hog and banned cell phones out right.
You think the French government is incompetent? That they don't have the best interest for their students and children at heart?

The fact that so many other countries & schools have tested this and shown hard results that banning Smart Devices & LapTops in the classroom has a overall positive affect on students.

Yet you're the one who keeps denying it and thinks it's beneficial.


---

Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp 'Once Upon A Time in Mexico'