| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Ivermectin Peer Reviewed Meta-Analysis |
| joe40001 06/27/21 1:20:04 PM #109: | Sad_Face posted... Did you guys watch the video? In the analysis, Campbell goes over that the trials were not standardized in terms of their usage of Ivermectin. For instance, it was used in a combination of drugs like HCQ for one trial versus being used without HCQ in another. The conclusion never insinuated that "Ivermectin is 100% decisively effective against Corona chan" but highlighted that this drug is worth exploring further. If this isn't science, then what is? I don't understand why people are coming in and saying OP is getting decimated in this discussion. I'm afraid very few of them actually watched the video. I shared the video from Dr. John Campbell because he seems very level headed in his summaries of things and not at all prone to hyperbole. It's a very sober representation of the science as we know it. Which is, approximately: "By all indications ivermectin is quite safe and affordable, and shows promise as a tool in fighting COVID." --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |