LogFAQs > #955617091

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Ivermectin Peer Reviewed Meta-Analysis
DarkRoast 06/30/21 8:54:50 PM #216:	joe40001 posted... The point is it is literally fda approved and it's like pulling teeth to get people to consider ivermectin might be helpful. Because the data doesn't back it up. That's the bottom line. A meta analysis that is heavily skewed by bad observational studies doesn't change that fact. Just like HCQ, Ivermectin is only being pushed by quacks who want to "prove experts wrong." It's so irritating having to deal with cranks coming into the hospital, demanding shit that doesn't work, and then claiming I'm part of some evil cabal. --- Razer Blade 15 - Core i7-9750H, 32 GB RAM (2666), RTX 2080 MQ <cite>DarkRoast posted [p:955617091] in Ivermectin... [t:79531697]...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted... </cite> <quote>The point is it is literally fda approved and it's like pulling teeth to get people to consider ivermectin might be helpful.</quote> Because the data doesn't back it up. That's the bottom line. A meta analysis that is heavily skewed by bad observational studies doesn't change that fact. Just like HCQ, Ivermectin is only being pushed by quacks who want to "prove experts wrong." It's so irritating having to deal with cranks coming into the hospital, demanding shit that doesn't work, and then claiming I'm part of some evil cabal. --- Razer Blade 15 - Core i7-9750H, 32 GB RAM (2666), RTX 2080 MQ</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1