LogFAQs > #955923762

You're blabbing on and on that Nintendo can't make Red Dead Redemption 2. But Sony Rockstar, Microsoft etc. don't know how to make a game like Nintendo either.

I enjoyed Red Dead Redemption 2. But the actual gameplay of it isn't that fun. It's sluggish, slow, missions are extremely linear to the point if you walk away too much you fail etc. If the game didn't have the incredibly impressive visuals, attention to detail and writing what else is really left? I wouldn't want Nintendo to develop a game like this. Nearly everyone else already does.

Sorry if Breath of the Wild not having horse balls that shrink in cold weather is a deal breaker but that isn't who they are.

This doesn't mean everything Nintendo is good. I have criticisms for all three. But you're points are pretty dumb man. There's a reason Nintendo games maintain their value whole nearly everyone else does not. Their games all age well.

SwayM posted...

Like this for example. The dock is just a USB-C sitting in the middle of a cheap plastic housing. And youre telling meinstead of Nintendo just creating a handheld switch that could dock into that portthey would need to create a whole new dock?

Then it would be bigger? And again you're ignoring the video chip and internals are different too. All things done to cut costs.

---

Kind Regards,
Darmik