UnfairRepresent posted... And I would understand that IF it was in service to a really good plot or twist or scene
But it wasn't. People were doing things that made no sense for no reason to push a plot that made no sense and was boring.
Why did Thor stop firing lighting at the Battle of New York when it was super effective? Well because they wanted to do a cool action scene. Fine.
There's a scene in Star Trek The Next Generation where a child runs in front of a Klingon. The Klingon picks him up menacingly. Security all go nuts, then the Klingon harmlessly puts him down and they're like "OMG u thought a Klingon would hurt an innocent child!? WE're an honorable warrior race"..... Well then why the fuck did you pick him up aggressively in the first place? Well so they could establish the ground rules of how Klingon honor works and give the villain some nuance.
Well it makes no sense but it was to make a plot point.
You can suspend disbelief for a story no problem but when the character actions AND plot AND scenes all go no where. That excuse runs out. You're suspending disbelief to suspend disbelief just to watch boring dull unrelatable crap that doesn't draw emotions out of you.
People dodged the question but I don't think anyone would have given a crap if Judge Lady died. No one cared because her character and plot went no where
So which scenes in Loki did the characters make decisions that made no sense? Your example is a...scene from Star Trek? Okay?
Judge Lady was an antagonist. I don't think you were supposed to care if she died. But her plot specifically has a cliffhanger because there's season 2. It's not finished. This is a TV show not a movie.
---
Kind Regards,
Darmik
... Copied to Clipboard!