LogFAQs > #956150485

I eventually reached the point of telling SK "very few of your posts compel me to engage with you"

I ramble a bit about how fake town pr breadcrumbs are stupidly easy and safe for scum to do in an open setup

me in response to people calling out my list of 4 (in light of flips I guess):

I don't understand the SK town reads, not saying they're invalid just that what I see is someone constantly muddying conversations everywhere and sticking their finger in every pie without actually achieving anything then shading others for not playing like he does more or less. He acts like he's some kind of champion of activity yet he routinely overlooks key relevant posts made by his targets (this happened with me and Aersoldorf both iirc). You all are like "aww lol good ol' SK" and I'm like this guy is a whirlwind of anti-helpful content.

Of course there's bias in that but there's quite a bit of objectivity as well.

Anyway.

I read into and put stock into Esooa's ISO

oh yeah! when I was looking back over the latter part of day 2 which I'd missed and saw the SK quote which proved my gamestate read 100% correct (I mean I can't prove I hadn't read these posts at eod2 but I hadn't ok) regarding scum planning to push Aers the next day etc.

Esooa: yeah it's extremely $%#!ing weird

okay I'm back to D2DC idk this is hard

##Vote D2DC

SilverKeith: Sigh.

I'll do this under the condition that If this is a townie get my prefered lunch tomorrow if I'm alive.

I don't care if this sounds scummy.

Esooa: who is your preferred lunch

SilverKeith: (I don't know)

(((Aersol))). Maybe Kyle.

TurboPuns: holy bonkernutnoodles batman

TurboPuns: I didn't even see this exchange happen day 2 yet I divined it in the final moments of the [day] are you kidding me

I reference tsp/esooa suspecting D2DC near eod2 and offer this gem:

I read this whole exchange (note: I removed one post from Esooa asking 'why' because quote limits or whatever) and I'm left wondering if tsp and esooa aren't just stretching with like, awkward forced champs meta reads because they are reluctant to scumread SK/Ephemera?

I mean I know I'm going to be compared to a broken record but. anyway, still reading

me reaching out to tsp and trying to get him to look back at his own day 1 posts which now with current data point to Ephemera as scum:

so @tonystarkprime this post, it's 2 hours into the game. in retrospect now and knowing that this case ephe made which your referencing basically boils down to "JK wasn't putting out content early on" do you still feel like granting the pass was the right call?

I've been reading Ephemera/Kyle m-ISO and I have to say Ephemera really just hung back a ton for day 1 and asked questions without pushing then was like "look at me I will post a CASE" and sat on it. and the case is just...this obviously scummy player isn't doing anything great. and I think they've just like, flirted with SK and Esooa a lot to be frank? lol so the townreads are like given out as candy

I start going down a rabbit hole on Kyle's ISO because when the reality was Kyle was so uber pocketed by Ephemera day 1 he couldn't see straight, what I was thinking at the time was oh Kyle is powerwolfing with Ephemera, like that's how in lock step they were lol

exhibit A for the day 1 pocket, from Ephe:

strongest townread is still probably kyle though because /damn/ that thought process feels exactly how i was approaching this game
etc etc

I have my little conspiracy theory about Kyle/Ephemera. At one point I noticed they both had lots of my town reads on their lists of 4 suspects (Ephe's was 4/4 town and Kyle's was 3/4 town (had TL, neither of SK/Ephe)

I tell SK directly to pretty much stfu get over yourself and stop expecting me to care what you think or engage with you lol

post 3839. I'm quoting a post which came from a scum who in their post also quoted a different scum. so me quoting scum quoting scum. The original post in this trilogy was Ephemera's "here's everybody's answers to my super duper helpful questions" post, the middle post was Trustworthy Liberal going "hmm yes based on all this amazingly helpful scientifically credible and definitely trustworthy data we obviously conclude that the team is: townA/townB/townC" and I'm like

I just want to point out I think this POE approach Ephemera brought forward has potential to be easily manipulated by scum. I mean if you're going to say we ought to chop someone just because three people named them on a list of FOUR names like. Can't we just try a little harder than that and talk about real cases etc. This is lazy and letting wolves just lead town off a cliff

Ephemera polls the game again, this time instead of 4 scum they ask for 1 town. I name tsp. good job me. tsp said sk. smh.

D2DC hitting me with the real hard stuff here:

D2DC: Turbo, you're the one that is most on SK/Mera. Do you really believe either of them are worth town spending one of our remaining lynches?

TurboPuns: I don't know what to tell you. Do I think there could be a wolf in SK/Ephemera? Well yeah I do. So do I think they're worth a lynch? Kind of the same question, no?

lol at me seeing an SK post like 20 lines long, quoting the first line and two words and then being like "I'm not reading past this he's already lost all credibility"

5 of 7 ISO pages done