LogFAQs > #956764372

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicCalifornia soon to have no more bacon due to people voting with their feelings.
adjl
08/04/21 9:21:28 AM
#68:


LinkPizza posted...
I never said they did. I did say they would eat us, though
LinkPizza posted...
So, we are doing onto others as they do onto us

The issue here is not merely eating the animals, but rather raising them in horrible, torturous conditions. Unfortunately, it's simply not possible to meet the US' demand for meat without resorting to such practices, so enforcing improvements in animal welfare is going to require people to eat less meat. In truth, that's generally a good thing, both nutritionally and ethically.

lihlih posted...
I never understood ethical treatment of animals that are going to be eaten anyway. What's the point of treating animals nicely if their whole purpose in life is just to feed us?

Generally, because torturing animals for profit and convenience isn't a great precedent.

---
This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1