LogFAQs > #957765773

Corrik7 posted...

Someone could OD and wipe out a family of 4 while a person could get covid and spread to no one. I mean, again, it just comes down to should a person be saved if they make a bad decision. It's how you value life in general. If you have an arbitrary imaginary line here then, you likely don't have the values you espouse generally. I, personally, am not for unlimited use of Narcan on ODs myself.

I, however, was seeing if he had contradictory values in or was consistent with what he thought. He doesn't appear to be.

I actually don't really have an opinion narcan. But equating the two seems really silly when there is obvious differences that fundamentally change how they affect others and not just the individual. Some one on drugs could kill those around them just like someone who gets a DUI could've caused a car accident that kills innocents. Or an alcoholic is more likely to abuse their domestic partner. But it isn't inherently part of taking the drug or drinking. They could also OD home alone doing nothing. It is impossible for someone not vaccinated to never be in a situation where they potentially contribute to the crisis. Unless I suppose the unvaccinated person never sees another living soul for the rest of their life

---

Conformity and rebellion...both ways are simple-minded--they are only for people who cannot cope with contradiction and ambiguity.