LogFAQs > #957224551

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	So does the Taliban takeover mean that the U.S. technically lost another war?
mooreandrew58 08/19/21 2:33:24 AM #26:	Payzmaykr posted... The purpose wasnt to defeat the taliban or establish government. It was to produce opium for the pharmaceutical companies and get oil. The soldiers have basically told us as much. It was about profit and nothing more. I feel it was also a case of retalition for 9/11. We done nothing it theoretically could have opened the door for more attacks if we simply wouldnt do anything about them. Both this and what you said could be true at the same time. --- Cid- "looks like that overgrown lobster just got served!" Bartz-"with cheese biscuts AND mashed potatoes!" <cite>mooreandrew58 posted [p:957224551] in So does th... [t:79620727]...</cite> <quote>Payzmaykr posted... </cite> <quote>The purpose wasnt to defeat the taliban or establish government. It was to produce opium for the pharmaceutical companies and get oil. The soldiers have basically told us as much. It was about profit and nothing more.</quote> I feel it was also a case of retalition for 9/11. We done nothing it theoretically could have opened the door for more attacks if we simply wouldnt do anything about them. Both this and what you said could be true at the same time. --- Cid- "looks like that overgrown lobster just got served!" Bartz-"with cheese biscuts AND mashed potatoes!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1