LogFAQs > #959137369

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicVaccine only gives 3% protection after 6 months?
joe40001
10/17/21 8:31:19 PM
#24:


hockeybub89 posted...
Until things are proven, they might as well not exist

You really don't get anything "proven", you get things demonstrated with increasingly levels of certainty, and so any data point is relevant when viewed in it's appropriate context.

Also Peer-reviewed things have been retracted.
Many not yet peer reviewed things have turned out to be true.

So I really don't even know what you mean when you say "proven".

But to say it's "not yet peer reviewed" isn't to say "it's likely made up". Yes, there are plenty of issues with it, so don't accept it at face value. But I do think even a preprint can suggest that J&J might have waning efficacy, and considering the FDA recommendation for a booster I think such a conclusion is certainly possible.

BTW, here seems to be the actual study:
Header:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.13.21264966v1
Pdf:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.13.21264966v1.full.pdf

---
"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1