LogFAQs > #959138507

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Vaccine only gives 3% protection after 6 months?
badjay 10/17/21 9:09:35 PM #32:	joe40001 posted... But to say it's "not yet peer reviewed" isn't to say "it's likely made up". Yes, there are plenty of issues with it, so don't accept it at face value. But I do think even a preprint can suggest that J&J might have waning efficacy, and considering the FDA recommendation for a booster I think such a conclusion is certainly possible. I looked quickly to see how they get this so called "3%," and here's their chart. Someone mind explaining this weird P-Value here? Because they use this august hazard ratio to come to the conclusion that it's about 3% effective because 1-Hazard ratio so the average for august is .97. 1-.97 is therefore the 3% they claim. But with their own self admitted p value of .5172 makes this really hard to believe. You generally want a p-value lower than .0001. So...is this whole thing pointless conjecture? Why is this released as if it's official when they post their own p-value of .5172. It makes no sense. I'll read the whole thing to try to find out, and edit this if anything pops up. --- [05:45:34] I bought an American L and it was like a tent <cite>badjay posted [p:959138507] in Vaccine on... [t:79714720]...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted... </cite> <quote> But to say it's "not yet peer reviewed" isn't to say "it's likely made up". Yes, there are plenty of issues with it, so don't accept it at face value. But I do think even a preprint can suggest that J&J might have waning efficacy, and considering the FDA recommendation for a booster I think such a conclusion is certainly possible.</quote>I looked quickly to see how they get this so called "3%," and here's their chart. Someone mind explaining this weird P-Value here? Because they use this august hazard ratio to come to the conclusion that it's about 3% effective because 1-Hazard ratio so the average for august is .97. 1-.97 is therefore the 3% they claim. But with their own self admitted p value of .5172 makes this really hard to believe. You generally want a p-value lower than .0001. So...is this whole thing pointless conjecture? Why is this released as if it's official when they post their own p-value of .5172. It makes no sense. I'll read the whole thing to try to find out, and edit this if anything pops up. --- [05:45:34] I bought an American L and it was like a tent</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1