LogFAQs > #959138980

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Vaccine only gives 3% protection after 6 months?
joe40001 10/17/21 9:27:19 PM #38:	DarkRoast posted... Judging by the ridiculous confidence interval, my guess is that basically nobody they studied (VA recipients) received the J&J vaccine, which is why that "3%" had no meaningful impact on the overall average immunity rate of ~60% Yeah, I'm not sure what's going on with the August data. Besides "3%" seems very fishy. The July data is more in keeping with what I've heard from other sources. If it drops to approximately 60% efficacy that could be why FDA is recommending boosters. Seems like the article writers picked an extreme data point not appreciating that it's p-value made it irrelevant. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 <cite>joe40001 posted [p:959138980] in Vaccine on... [t:79714720]...</cite> <quote>DarkRoast posted... </cite> <quote>Judging by the ridiculous confidence interval, my guess is that basically nobody they studied (VA recipients) received the J&J vaccine, which is why that "3%" had no meaningful impact on the overall average immunity rate of ~60%</quote> Yeah, I'm not sure what's going on with the August data. Besides "3%" seems very fishy. The July data is more in keeping with what I've heard from other sources. If it drops to approximately 60% efficacy that could be why FDA is recommending boosters. Seems like the article writers picked an extreme data point not appreciating that it's p-value made it irrelevant. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1