LogFAQs > #959139024

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicVaccine only gives 3% protection after 6 months?
joe40001
10/17/21 9:29:12 PM
#39:


MabusIncarnate posted...
They likely will never, ever be 100%. Even in modern times, birth control, condoms, hell even a woman getting her tubes tied isn't 100% protection, and pregnancy can still happen. It's pretty senseless to opt out of a rubber if you aren't trying get pregnant, just because it isn't a guaranteed protection. I think this is among the biggest annoyances when it comes to anti-vax people presenting arguments. No shit, it isn't a lock if you get vaccinated, but reducing the risk severely, and getting everyone on board makes the future of this virus look a hell of a lot less bleak.

Point being, it's been so politicized now, that people are so far right that they want reason to hate the vax, and the "libs who support it" need to be wrong. Not saying this is your stance Joe, but it's very much happening.

Oh yeah, I basically agree with all that you said.

PS: I also IMO think people are too glib about worrying about risks of pregnancies. People use condoms/the pill like they are 100% effective when they just aren't. And even something like a 1/200 risk is HUGE when it comes to bringing a human life into the world.

---
"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1