LogFAQs > #959139038

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Vaccine only gives 3% protection after 6 months?
DarkRoast 10/17/21 9:29:51 PM #40:	joe40001 posted... Yeah, I'm not sure what's going on with the August data. Besides "3%" seems very fishy. The July data is more in keeping with what I've heard from other sources. If it drops to approximately 60% efficacy that could be why FDA is recommending boosters. Seems like the article writers picked an extreme data point not appreciating that it's p-value made it irrelevant. It's even more egregious than that, because that study wasn't even published yet. They literally took a pre-published article, and focused on a data point that is most likely irrelevant. --- Razer Blade 15 - Core i7 9750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q, 32 GB DDR4 2666 <cite>DarkRoast posted [p:959139038] in Vaccine on... [t:79714720]...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted... </cite> <quote>Yeah, I'm not sure what's going on with the August data. Besides "3%" seems very fishy. The July data is more in keeping with what I've heard from other sources. If it drops to approximately 60% efficacy that could be why FDA is recommending boosters. Seems like the article writers picked an extreme data point not appreciating that it's p-value made it irrelevant.</quote> It's even more egregious than that, because that study wasn't even published yet. They literally took a pre-published article, and focused on a data point that is most likely irrelevant. --- Razer Blade 15 - Core i7 9750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q, 32 GB DDR4 2666</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1