LogFAQs > #959843994

Do people think that If he's convicted, it won't just give these same right wing people the excuse to attack any anti-protestors that show up to their stuff?

They will use the same victim blaming shit the left has been saying. "Shouldn't have gone to a riot" "knew it was dangerous", "no right to be there", "just being there was provocation", "they looked threatening" etc.

It will also make it harder for people to prove self-defense in court because multiple people attacking you is not enough.

Anybody watching the trial can see it's a pointless waste of time and money. The prosecution barely has anything because it's obvious to anyone that hasn't had their brains melted from left vs right that it was self-defense.

Just look at how someone with a PhD posted this dishonest nonsense yesterday.

WeeWeiWiiWie posted...

Someone who crosses state lines with guns for the express purpose to shoot people probably shouldn't be labeled self defense. But what do I know?

It's irrelevant to bring up the state crossing because that part wasn't illegal and he lived on the border 20 miles away from Kenosha where his dad lives. It's less than going from Brooklyn to the Bronx or about the same as the bottom of Manhattan to the top.

Then he says "guns". So this guy's doesn't even have the story right since it was just one gun.

Then he says "express purpose to shoot people" when none of the evidence that has come out shows anything like that, ignoring how something that dumb can be used to fuck over everybody.

It's just surprising tbh since he's been getting modded for insulting people who have been posting false information about COVID vaccines.

---

"It lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge"