LogFAQs > #960198860

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Go See Ghostbusters: Afterlife
Forceful_Dragon 11/21/21 1:15:54 AM #21:	Mega Mana posted... This is a proper sequel to Ghostbusters from the five minutes I've seen. In tone, in spirit, in comedy, in characters. Precisely! Not Dave posted... the original Ghostbusters is pretty bad Whoa BlueCrystalTear posted... I should probably watch the original Ghostbusters before seeing this one, seeing as it's been like eight years. But I do wanna see it, unlike with the 2016 one. It's probably been at least a year or two since I've seen the original, but it was a staple growing up so I was well preferred for any of the references. TheRock1525 posted... I do laugh that RLM accurately predicted ~~CGI Ghost Harold Ramis.~~ Massive spoilers in ^this^ post and my reply: Honestly I was a bit surprised that they showed us so much of him at the end. The initial sequence of the movie (before he died) they very carefully shot it so that you never got a good look at him and that seemed to be pretty deliberate. Personally I think I would have been fine if we got Ghost Egon just a tiny bit ~~less~~* than we did. The shot of him bracing Phoebe's arm was a fantastic hair raising moment. Also when the other ghostbusters turned to notice him. I think I would have been okay if that was it, but the amount we got was fine too. --- ~C~ FD https://imgur.com/dGDfxaw <cite>Forceful_Dragon posted [p:960198860] in Go See Gho... [t:79769901]...</cite> <quote>Mega Mana posted... </cite> <quote>This is a proper sequel to Ghostbusters from the five minutes I've seen. In tone, in spirit, in comedy, in characters.</quote> Precisely! Not Dave posted... </cite> <quote>the original Ghostbusters is pretty bad</quote> Whoa BlueCrystalTear posted... </cite> <quote>I should probably watch the original Ghostbusters before seeing this one, seeing as it's been like eight years. But I do wanna see it, unlike with the 2016 one.</quote> It's probably been at least a year or two since I've seen the original, but it was a staple growing up so I was well preferred for any of the references. TheRock1525 posted... </cite> <quote>I do laugh that RLM accurately predicted CGI Ghost Harold Ramis.</quote> *Massive spoilers in ^this^ post and my reply: Honestly I was a bit surprised that they showed us so much of him at the end. The initial sequence of the movie (before he died) they very carefully shot it so that you never got a good look at him and that seemed to be pretty deliberate. Personally I think I would have been fine if we got Ghost Egon just a tiny bit less than we did. The shot of him bracing Phoebe's arm was a fantastic hair raising moment. Also when the other ghostbusters turned to notice him. I think I would have been okay if that was it, but the amount we got was fine too. --- ~C~ FD https://imgur.com/dGDfxaw</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1