Topic List | Page List: 1 |
---|---|
Topic | 16 ÷ 2(2 + 2) = x |
uwnim 11/27/21 2:30:47 PM #44: | markconigliaro posted... This is incorrect. We can see two different styles on display in this topic. What matters is to have an internally consistent set of rules, not the exact rules. While something simple, like say 7 multiplied by 8 is 56(in base 10) and has natural rules, the symbol used to express this operation can vary from place to place and when you combine multiple simple operations together, you need a grammar system which can also vary. markconigliaro posted... They understand that, however, in some styles x(y) is not the same thing as x*y. The x(y) has a higher priority level. For a good example on styles, take somthing like -4^2. In some styles that is negative four to the 2nd power and is 16. In others, it would be -16 because the - is taken to not be part of the 4, but an operation saying to flip the sign of the result. So like -4^2 is (-4)^2 in one and -(4^2) in another. Neither of them are wrong, because the grammar is arbitrary and not based on anything real and physical. So as long as the chosen way of doing things is consistently done, you end up with a coherent math system. --- I want a pet Lavos Spawn. [Order of the Cetaceans: Phocoena dioptrica] ... Copied to Clipboard! |
Topic List | Page List: 1 |