LogFAQs > #961300480

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicWhat is this LVM and HVM bullshit?
Fony
12/29/21 8:50:33 AM
#16:


Lokison posted...
If they use those, can we use LVF and HVF?

Like, HVF has big boobies, LVF has small boobies?

Some older women try to use the same parameters, but the only things that make a woman "high value" for dating is youth, beauty and good attitude.

A 24 year old woman who is fit, feminine and friendly is "high value". A 37 year old, slightly heavy, argumentative, jaded woman making $230K is not high value.

High value and low value just mean they're generally desirable above the norm. This would be good looking for both sexes, not a hard requirement for men though. Men for sure money, fitness, social status, style, confidence and height are huge factors.

Boob size isn't at the forefront, but you're very close in parsing a woman's appearance.

Think about the many studies showing how women strongely prefer taller men who earn more and have certain personlities, and men of all ages prefer women around 23-25. Now just add a term to easily and quickly point to that preference.

---
It's not the end of the world, but we can see it from here.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1