LogFAQs > #961374404

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicIt was a Beatles Vs beach boys debate on twitter the other day.
clyde_frog
01/01/22 12:29:19 AM
#12:


Xethuminra posted...
Metallica

They've survived the Nu-Metal wave, still thrive amid the HipHop generation, and technically speaking.... Have had a longer run than The Beatles, if I'm not mistaken. They probably have just as many classics. Their lineup has changed a bit over the years, so that's a strike against them. Given the evolution from trash to hair to rock and beyond, id put them on par at least. The Beatles got popular as a boyband, tbh, but Metallica instantly started evolving from their 2nd album onward. On the other hand, The Beatles has a little more fluff & stuff with lore & cartoons. I'm thinking it's comparable if not parallel.

You cant seriously be informed of the Beatles discography and make this claim, so Im going to assume youre just being ignorant on the matter. This is a laughably bad comparison.

---
http://i.imgur.com/UFOAF.gif http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m71fpsIYJA1qf1116o1_500.jpg
~Formerly known as BabeFAQs~
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1