LogFAQs > #961837589

Straughan posted...

*discussion of child abuse trigger warning on both videos*

...technically he's discussing the downstream effects of child abuse, not the abuse itself. I'm still not sure I agree with his assessment for pragmatic reasons (because stemming the circulation might make it easier to stop the actual abuse), but it sounds like he's suggesting that ownership of the materials isn't a problem rather than advocating abuse (which he indirectly criticizes?). And I'm not sure under what context his discussion originally began. If he started that apropos of nothing, that would raise some questions. I'm not familiar with the guy at all, which is probably another useful context.